The GEO scorecard: is your site ready for AI search?
Search engines rank pages; AI engines retrieve and cite them. Here are the five questions we grade a site on to measure how ready it is for LLMs, vector retrieval and AI answers.
Zero-click search has passed 60 percent and AI Overviews push it above 80 on the queries they touch. Informational traffic is dying; intent traffic is not. The priority order we now recommend to Kenyan businesses, from local presence to citation-worthy content.
By Hanova Editorial
The most important SEO statistic of this decade is not about rankings. It is this: roughly two-thirds of Google searches now end without a click on any result at all. The searcher asks, Google answers on the results page itself, and the visit that a business used to win never happens. On queries where Google shows an AI Overview, the no-click share climbs past 80 percent. If your SEO strategy still assumes that ranking first means getting the visit, it is a strategy for a search engine that no longer exists.
Two things stacked. First, featured snippets, knowledge panels, maps packs and related questions have spent years absorbing the easy informational queries. Second, AI Overviews arrived on top: Google now generates a written answer above the results for a large share of informational searches, and the click-through rate for the top organic result on those queries has fallen off a cliff. Seer Interactive's tracking measured organic CTR on AI Overview queries dropping by roughly 60 percent in just over a year. About a quarter of users who read an AI Overview simply end the session: question answered, nobody visited anyone.
It is tempting to read that as "SEO is dead". The truth is narrower and more useful: informational traffic is dying, and intent traffic is not.
Look at what survives, because the pattern is consistent across every study:
That last point is why we treat classic SEO and generative engine optimisation as a single practice. We have written about how generative engines decide what to cite and published a scorecard for AI-search readiness; the short version is that the same work now serves both audiences. Clean structure, real expertise with named authors, pages that answer one question completely, accurate business information everywhere: Google's crawler rewards it with rankings, and the answer engines reward it with citations. What no longer earns its keep is the old volume play of thin posts chasing informational keywords, because those are precisely the queries whose clicks have evaporated.
The budget conversation has changed shape, so here is the priority order we actually recommend. First, own your local presence: a complete, actively managed Google Business Profile, consistent name-address-phone everywhere, reviews you ask for and answer, and a genuinely useful page per location or service area. Second, build the pages that intent queries land on: service pages with real prices or ranges, comparison pages that answer the question honestly, case studies with named clients. Third, write fewer, better essays designed to be cited, not just ranked: original numbers, local specifics, a named author. Fourth, measure visits from search alongside calls, WhatsApp messages and direction requests, because in a zero-click world some of your SEO wins never touch your website.
Search is not sending less intent our way. It is sending less curiosity. Businesses that reorganise around that distinction are finding SEO still pays; the ones optimising for 2019 are buying traffic that Google now keeps. If you want an honest read on where your site stands, our SEO practice starts with an audit, and asking us where your search traffic actually went is free.
Search engines rank pages; AI engines retrieve and cite them. Here are the five questions we grade a site on to measure how ready it is for LLMs, vector retrieval and AI answers.
Eighteen months of measured experiments across ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity, what triggers a brand citation, what gets paraphrased away, and how to structure content so the LLMs name you.